![]() ![]() ![]() So, I want to compare the same framing with the different setups, because that is how I use them. I know that the framing should not be the same, because mu43 is a crop of the FF sensor, so the framing and perspective cannot be the same and all that.īut I used the same, because if for example, I want to do a head and shoulders portrait, I will do a head and shoulders portrait with the 5D, if thats the camera I have with me, or the Olympus, if I happen to have it with me. The Longer lens is more desirable for portraits because it provide close up to your subject without weird distortion from a wide angle lens. In fact, bokeh becomes a consideration anywhere where shallow depth of field eliminates background clutter and emphasizes the sharpness of the subject. I tried to do the same framing on both cameras. I know they are not exactly the same focal lengths, but the Sigma is about 46mm and the panasonic is 40mm equivalent, so, pretty close for what I was after. Background blur is the out of focus area in a photo behind your subject caused by using a shallow depth of field. I used the Sigma 50mm 1.4 on the 5D and the Panasonic 20mm 1.7 on the Olympus. I did today a very quick and not very scientific test to compare the DOF and Bokeh of the Full Frame 5D with the Micro Four Thirds E-PL2. I was not totally convinced, and I still ain't. I was thinking I would miss some things from my 5D, but if I'm not shooting it, I might as well sell it. with an FX camera, you would need to get closer). ![]() But the prime lens is not a one-trick-pony. Of course, the advantage of a kit lens is versatility. This got me thinking about selling my 5D and just use the money I make with the sell to buy some more mu43 gear and totally switch formats. Re: Bokeh differences, FX vs DX In reply to ronaldysuhendra Assuming the composition/framing between the FX and DX cameras are the same, the distance between the camera and the focused subject would be different (i.e. Just as your zoom lenses limit the shallowness of your depth of field and restrict your bokeh because of their comparatively narrow aperture openings, the wide-aperture 50mm lens is just the right cure for low-light handheld photography. I've been having fun with it, and due to it's small size and weight, I've been bringing it along more often.Īs such, my 5D has been collecting some dust on the shelf. Since I was shooting in available light using the Sun-Swatter, changing exposures was easily accomplished by. The f/1.4 image looked softer and a better choice for a flattering portrait. The f/2.8 version had a little more detail, but what I really noticed was the bokeh quality. So, I've been shooting my Olympus E-PL2 for the past month. But when comparing f/1.4 to f/2.8, there was less difference. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |